ReviewInternational journal of endocrinology2026
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Swab Cultures and Tissue Biopsy for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Infections.
Review in International journal of endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Swab Cultures and Tissue Biopsy for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Infections.International journal of endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy and concordance of swab cultures and tissue biopsy for identifying causative pathogens. Furthermore, to compare the sensitivity, specificity and overall diagnostic performance of swab cultures and tissue biopsies, using tissue biopsy as the reference standard in infected diabetic foot wounds. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using CINAHL, Embase and PubMed for published studies from inception to April 2025. Eligible studies compared the diagnostic accuracy or the list of pathogens of swab cultures and tissue biopsy in adult patients diagnosed with diabetic foot infections. A random-effects diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis was undertaken. Results: Seventeen studies were included. Swab cultures identified 765 Gram-positive microbial pathogens compared to 875 identified by tissue biopsies and 457 Gram-negative pathogens compared to 452 identified by tissue biopsies. The three most prevalent microbial species were Discussion: Our findings are that swab cultures could identify Gram-negative pathogens and may still be acceptable for detecting Gram-positive and overall infections. While tissue biopsy remains the reference standard, swab cultures may represent a practical and accessible alternative in situations where tissue biopsy is not feasible or not performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.