Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630408›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

When Steroids Complicate the Diagnosis: Recurrent Steroid-Induced Psychosis, Severe Hyponatraemia With Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizure, and Acute Lacunar Infarction During Treatment for Suspected Giant Cell Arteritis.

Bola Reyad

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bola ReyadGeneral Internal Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Isle of Wight NHS Trust, Newport, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 77-year-old woman with a history of palindromic rheumatism and a previous episode of steroid-induced psychosis was treated with high-dose prednisolone for suspected giant cell arteritis because of the risk of irreversible visual loss. Within days, she developed recurrent psychotic symptoms requiring hospital admission. During her admission, she experienced profound hypovolaemic hyponatraemia complicated by a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. Following correction of her sodium level, brain magnetic resonance imaging unexpectedly demonstrated an acute left basal ganglia lacunar infarction despite the absence of focal neurological deficits. The coexistence of recurrent steroid-induced psychosis, severe electrolyte disturbance, seizure, and acute cerebral infarction created a significant diagnostic challenge, prompting multidisciplinary involvement from rheumatology, neurology, stroke medicine, psychiatry, endocrinology, and general internal medicine. Further investigations, including CT angiography, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, autoimmune screening, and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, were undertaken to evaluate for possible systemic or central nervous system vasculitis. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy, particularly when neuropsychiatric symptoms coexist with metabolic and neurological abnormalities. It also illustrates the value of multidisciplinary assessment in distinguishing medication-related adverse effects from alternative or concurrent pathology.

Indexed as

central nervous system vasculitiscorticosteroid therapydiagnostic challengegeneralized tonic-clonic seizuregiant cell arteritisglucocorticoid toxicityhyponatraemialacunar infarctionmultidisciplinary managementsteroid-induced psychosis

Identifiers

PMID42630408
PMCPMC13494317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.