ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Perceptions of inclusion among students with and without self-reported learning disabilities in Saudi schools.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study examined perceptions of inclusive education among Saudi students with and without self-reported indicators of Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD), addressing limited evidence from Saudi schools. Methods: A correlational design was used with 694 Saudi students in Grades 4-9. Participants completed Arabic-translated and culturally adapted measures of inclusion climate and self-reported SLD indicators. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), Pearson correlations, and independent-samples Results: Higher self-reported SLD indicators were significantly associated with lower perceived inclusion. Female students and those accessing resource rooms reported higher SLD indicators, whereas perceived inclusion did not differ by gender or resource room access. Elementary students reported higher perceived inclusion than middle school students. Discussion: The findings highlight developmental differences in inclusion experiences and underscore the importance of fostering belonging in inclusive schools. They also provide practical implications for strengthening inclusive practices and promoting equitable participation in mainstream education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.