Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630388›Full record

ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2026

Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Mirang Lee, Ji-Young Lee, In Ho Kang, Chang Ohk Sung, Ha Ra Jun, Dae Wook Hwang, Eunsung Jun, Sung-Min Chun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mirang LeeDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Young LeeAsan Center for Cancer Genome Discovery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In Ho KangDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang Ohk SungDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ha Ra JunDepartment of Medical Science, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae Wook HwangDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eunsung JunDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-2430
Sung-Min ChunDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3357-1382

Funding

NCIRD CDC HHS K01 IP000050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited early detection strategies. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a noninvasive method for tumor monitoring and prognostic prediction. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of ctDNA in PDAC, focusing on stage-dependent variations in ctDNA detection rate and its association with survival. Methods: The study included 35 patients with PDAC. Plasma and tissue samples were evaluated with next-generation sequencing to detect ctDNA and assess the concordance of mutations detected in ctDNA with those detected in tissue samples. The rates of ctDNA positivity and partial concordance were evaluated across disease stages. Demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgical outcomes were also evaluated. Results: Among the study population, 91.4% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and ctDNA was detected in 57.1% of the patients. KRAS mutations in ctDNA were identified in 11.4% of the patients, ranging from 0.0% in stage I PDAC to 28.6% in stage IV PDAC. The partial concordance rate between ctDNA and tumor tissue mutations increased from 0.0% in stage I to 66.7% in stage IV. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the two-year survival tended to be worse in patients with detectable ctDNA than in those without ctDNA (44.0% vs. 86.2%, p = 0.071). Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates the potential clinical relevance of ctDNA analysis in patients with PDAC, especially those with advanced disease. However, its limited sensitivity in the detection of early-stage PDAC highlights the need for methodologic improvements. Our findings support the potential integration of ctDNA analysis into clinical workflows as a biomarker for disease monitoring and prognosis.

Indexed as

circulating tumor DNAmutation concordancepancreatic ductal adenocarcinomasurvivaltissue NGS

Identifiers

PMID42630388
PMCPMC13494301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.