ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026
Effects of repetitive scanning ultrasound on the intraneuronal dendritic signalling of CA1 pyramidal neurons.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neural development is regulated by several spatiotemporally changing factors, which are essential for enabling neurons to develop functional networks, during early developmental stages. Additionally, external physical stimuli, like scanning prenatal ultrasound (US) examination, may influence neural development. Aim of our study is to examine potential consequences of diagnostic level ultrasound exposure during the early phase of hippocampal CA1 neural network development by using computational models. Methods: Using Results: Our computer models predict that diagnostic level US treatment does not induce changes in specific membrane resistance and capacitance of neuronal membrane. Correlative analyses of simulated dendritic impulse propagation in US treated (UT) and non-treated control neurons (NT) revealed minor differences in attenuations and delays of somatopetally propagating PSPs in the passive model, and these alterations became even less pronounced when hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) cation channels and A-type potassium (K Discussion: We conclude that subthreshold somatopetal signalling properties of US-treated CA1 neuronal membranes remain predominantly at the level of non-treated cells. This conservation is due primarily to HCN channels, contributing to net membrane conductance at rest in an inhomogeneous manner over the somato-dendritic surface. The HCN channels balance the effects of US-induced morphological alterations on dendritic signalling. Conservation of signalling properties align with our independent prediction on the conservation of synaptic integration and input pattern recognition in UT neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.