ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2026
Analysis of Non-responders to LNG-IUS in Cases of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) or menorrhagia, a common complaint among women during their reproductive years, significantly impacts women's quality of life, productivity, and healthcare costs. The treatment options range from conservative medical management to minimally invasive procedures and hysterectomy. While levonorgestrel-intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is established as an effective treatment for HMB, there is a lack of significant research on factors determining non-response in women with HMB. This study aims to analyse the factors behind non-response to LNG-IUS in women with HMB. Material and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at BARC Hospital, Mumbai, from January 2017 to March 2020, including 88 patients with HMB who received LNG-IUS. Non-responders to LNG-IUS were analysed for reasons of failure, including endometrial thickness, hysteroscopy, and biopsy reports. Patients were contacted one year later to assess treatment outcomes, and alternative treatments or surgery was offered to non-responders, with final histopathological findings documented. Results and Discussion: In this study, 29.5% of patients were non-responders, with the majority aged 40-44 years, and most experiencing persistent heavy bleeding, dysmenorrhea, device expulsion, or misplacement. Half of the non-responders had an endometrial thickness of less than 10 mm and proliferative endometrium on biopsy. Nine patients underwent hysterectomy, with adenomyosis found in seven of them. Conclusion: LNG-IUS is effective in treating HMB, but factors, such as age, endometrial thickness, and certain underlying structural and non-structural pathologies, may contribute to non-response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.