ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Identification and clinical evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers for ischemic cardiomyopathy based on machine learning and transcriptomics.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is a leading cause of heart failure, yet precise molecular tools for potential diagnosis remain limited. This study aims to identify and clinically evaluate novel diagnostic biomarkers for ICM by integrating comprehensive transcriptomic analysis, machine learning algorithms, and real-world serological assessment. Methods: Gene expression profiles from the GEO database were systematically analyzed using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and 12 distinct machine learning algorithms to screen for optimal diagnostic targets. Crucially, to bridge the gap between computational prediction and clinical application, the identified core diagnostic genes were evaluated at the protein level using an independent clinical cohort. Peripheral serum samples from 90 individuals (45 ICM patients and 45 controls) were analyzed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: We identified 501 differentially expressed genes, with the MEcyan WGCNA module showing the strongest correlation with ICM. Among the 12 evaluated machine learning models, AdaBoost showed the highest internal predictive performance (AUC = 0.976). However, this estimate is exploratory and potentially optimistic due to feature pre-selection prior to cross-validation. From this candidate pool, SEPP1, CILP, and FRZB were selected Conclusion: By integrating computational screening with preliminary clinical serological analysis, this study identifies SEPP1, CILP, and FRZB as potential serological biomarkers for ICM. This computational model and the accompanying preliminary serological evidence provide a theoretical basis for future clinical exploration and diagnostic biomarker development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.