ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Inconclusive mutually reinforcing effects between associative learning and fluid intelligence: simulated reanalyses and a comment on Ren et al. (2026).
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on findings from analyses with the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM), Ren et al. concluded reinforcing longitudinal effects between associative learning and fluid intelligence. However, the RI-CLPM is susceptible to spurious findings. Here, we analyzed data simulated to resemble the data used by Ren et al. with alternative models and found discrepant increasing, decreasing, and null prospective effects between associative learning and fluid intelligence. Hence, the conclusions by Ren et al. appear not to be supported by their own data. It is important for researchers to bear in mind that correlations, including effects in the RI-CLPM, in observational (i.e., non-experimental) data may be spurious and do, consequently, not prove genuine (i.e., non-spurious) influence. We recommend researchers to fit alternative models to data and to base conclusions on an aggregation of findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.