ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
The impact of arm position on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric toddler chest computed tomography: a phantom and clinical study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effects of different arm positions on image quality and radiation dose in toddler chest computed tomography (CT). Methods: A phantom experiment and a retrospective clinical study were conducted. In the phantom study, an anthropomorphic phantom was scanned 10 times in three arm positions: arms fully elevated (Group A), arms incompletely elevated with humeri superimposed over shoulders (Group B), and arms alongside the body (Group C). In the clinical study, 120 patients aged 12-36 months were categorized into corresponding groups (Groups 1-3; Results: Arm position significantly affected CT values and noise in the phantom study, though noise differences were modest. In patients, only one ROI showed a significant noise difference [4.30 HU, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.91-7.69]. Subjective scores were highest for Group 1, lowest for Group 2, and intermediate for Group 3; all images remained diagnostically adequate. Group 2 exhibited the highest radiation dose. Although the DLP difference between Groups 1 and 3 did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted Conclusion: For toddler chest CT, arms fully elevated is the optimal position. Arms alongside the body is an acceptable alternative when elevation is unfeasible. Humeral superimposition over the shoulders should be avoided whenever possible, as it increases radiation dose and degrades image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.