ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Vicarious Trauma Among a Sample of European Nurses: Using Qualitative Findings From a Mixed Methods Study to Develop an Organisational Leadership Guideline.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vicarious Trauma Among a Sample of European Nurses: Using Qualitative Findings From a Mixed Methods Study to Develop an Organisational Leadership Guideline.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis paper presents the qualitative findings of a European mixed-methods study exploring vicarious trauma (VT) among nurses working in addiction services. Its primary objective is to share with readers the newly developed organisational leadership guidelines in the hope of mitigating the impact of VT.
backgroundVT is a recognised occupational hazard for nurses working with traumatised populations, particularly in addiction services, where proactive and supportive leadership is critical in fostering resilience and safeguarding staff wellbeing. However, organisations have failed to implement proactive strategies to identify, manage or prevent VT. This study addresses this gap by examining nurses' lived experiences of VT and the role of leadership in reducing the impact of VT. These insights together with results from the quantitative phase of the study, alongside a literature review, were used to develop the guidelines.
methodFifteen participants from the study's quantitative phase were interviewed using semistructured questions. Data were analysed thematically and an inductive coding approach ensured findings were grounded in participants' narratives.
resultsFive core themes emerged are as follows: (1) positive growth associated with VT, (2) recognising negative consequences, (3) the role of organisational leadership, (4) support systems and (5) the evolving identity of addiction nurses. Leadership was recognised as functioning either as a risk or as a protective factor, depending on its form and application.
conclusionsThe qualitative findings of the study were used to develop the empirically informed organisational leadership guidelines to address VT in nursing. These guidelines represent a significant step forward in equipping healthcare organisations to protect their staff through proactive, structured organisational leadership interventions. Examples of these include awareness, education and support. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This study underscores the critical role of organisational leadership in either exacerbating or alleviating VT. By implementing evidence-based guidelines that promote awareness, shared decision-making, emotional support and trauma-informed practices, nurse leaders can improve staff wellbeing, reduce stress and enhance service delivery in addiction service settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.