ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
Heterodonty in the teeth of the turiasaurian sauropod from Angeac-Charente (Early Cretaceous, southwestern France): Comparison of anatomical and geometric morphometric approaches.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sauropod teeth are often described within a taxonomic framework, with few studies focusing on heterodonty or intraspecific morphological variation. The Lagerstätte of Angeac-Charente has yielded 167 heart-shaped isolated teeth from a single turiasaurian species. Observations of this material during its collection in the field, preparation, and recording in the collections suggest the presence of possible heterodonty in this species. In this study, we analyze this heterodonty using both comparative anatomy and 3D geometric morphometric analyses coupled with machine learning algorithms. Our principal objective is to determine whether one of the two approaches-quantitative or qualitative-is more effective than the other and whether they can be complementary studying heterodonty. The results confirm the presence of heterodonty, with five different morphotypes, which correspond to premaxillary, maxillary anterior, maxillary posterior, anterior dentary, and posterior dentary teeth. An anteroposteriorly decreasing size gradient in the jaw is observed. Qualitative comparative anatomy is the quickest method, with few conflicts in morphotyping, while quantitative approaches might resolve ambiguities through more precise and replicable analyses. Together, these methods provide complementary insights and allow retrospective positioning of teeth within the jaw. This study, therefore, allows for the reliable assignment of teeth to specific regions or positions in turiasaurian sauropods. Such assignment work is also necessary for many other taxa, and this method will, therefore, be useful for future research. Indeed, it is fully applicable to other sauropod taxa, theropods, or crocodilians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.