ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Cellularized Skin Substitute Bioengineering for Regenerative Medicine: Cell Sources, Culture Strategies, and Transition Toward Defined, Xeno-Free Culture Systems.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The skin provides a model for regenerative medicine, prompting the design of cultured reconstructed tissue substitutes. Translational research and bioengineering have indeed given rise to clinical applications such as the grafting of cultured skin substitutes in severe burn patients, more than four decades ago, and more recently the correction of a genodermatosis by a cell and gene therapy approach. In addition, therapeutic uses of bioengineered skin substitutes are considered for chronic wounds and ulcers, which affect much larger patient populations. This history has given rise to multiple innovations involving original concepts, combined with new methodological and technical approaches. The variables relate to the cell sources used, which may include cells from neonatal or adult skin, autologous or allogeneic, or skin cells obtained by directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells. They also concern methods and culture protocols used for cell expansion phase in two-dimensional (2D) culture, then the production phase of 3D skin substitutes, a major current challenge being the elimination of constituents not chemically defined and/or of animal origin. By outlining the main technological options, this review aims to guide the design of next-generation skin substitutes that will reconcile biological performance, regulatory expectations and realistic clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.