ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026
Fatigue and Driving Safety in Early Parenthood: Developing Feasible Risk-Reduction Strategies Through Co-Design.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fatigue and Driving Safety in Early Parenthood: Developing Feasible Risk-Reduction Strategies Through Co-Design.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
issue addressedFatigue-related driving guidance typically assumes that individuals have sufficient control over sleep and travel decisions to implement recommended strategies. Early parenthood represents a critical exception, characterised by chronic sleep disruption and constrained capacity to avoid driving while fatigued. Despite this, there are limited practical resources available to support safer decision-making in this population.
methodsUsing a participatory design approach grounded in co-design principles and aligned with the Double Diamond framework, 14 parents of children aged ≤ 5 years completed a workshop and a subsequent survey. This process aimed to inform the co-design of educational resources for new parents by examining experiences of fatigue and fatigued driving, the feasibility of common fatigue management strategies, and preferences for content, format, and delivery of driving safety resources.
resultsParents shaped the key content areas, emphasising recognising fatigue, making safer driving decisions when tired, and identifying proactive strategies to reduce fatigue risk that were feasible within the constraints of early parenthood. Participants highlighted the importance of creating brief, easy-to-digest materials. Insights informed the development of a dedicated website (www.safedrivingforparents.com) and seven infographics centred on key domains identified by participants.
conclusionsThese resources represent an important initial step toward a broader, scalable educational approach that could be delivered in partnership with health services and road safety organisations; however, evaluation is needed to understand their effectiveness in real-world contexts. SO WHAT?: These findings highlight the need for health promotion approaches that prioritise feasible risk-reduction strategies in populations with limited control over sleep and travel demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.