Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42629599›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science2026

Comparative Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Haskap Berry (Lonicera caerulea L.) Extract, Gallic Acid, and Combination Against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris for Application in Orange Juice.

Feiran Qi, Jinhua Liu, Tianyang Xu, Jiatong Meng, Mingyue Ren, Miao He, Yuxin Liu, Yanyu Shi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Feiran QiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Jinhua LiuTechnology Center of Changchun Customs, Changchun, China.
Tianyang XuInnovation Practice Center, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Jiatong MengInnovation Practice Center, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Mingyue RenJilin Institute of Product Quality Supervision and Inspection, Changchun, China.
Miao HeJilin Institute of Product Quality Supervision and Inspection, Changchun, China.
Yuxin LiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Yanyu ShiInnovation Practice Center, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7537-7862

Funding

Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Plan Project 20230204063YY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris, a thermo-acidophilic, spore-forming bacterium, is a major cause of spoilage in fruit juices, leading to substantial economic losses. This study presents a comparative evaluation of gallic acid (GA), Lonicera caerulea L. ethanol extract (LCEE), and LCEE + GA as natural preservatives against this spoilage agent. The assessment included the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). Notably, the MBC of LCEE alone could not be definitively established under tested conditions due to bacterial regrowth at concentrations above 12.5 mg/mL. Antimicrobial mechanisms were analyzed via membrane integrity and function assays (ATP levels, membrane potential, SEM, FCM, confocal laser scanning microscopy [CLSM]), and antioxidant capacity was measured using DPPH and ABTS methods. Practical efficacy was further tested in a fruit juice model through physicochemical. LCEE showed stronger bacteriostatic activity, whereas GA demonstrated superior bactericidal efficacy. Their combination revealed significant synergy (fractional inhibitory concentration [FIC] indices: 0.5 for cells, 0.38 for spores), drastically reducing the effective MIC and MBC of both components and accelerating cell death. Mechanistically, all treatments induced membrane damage, hyperpolarization, and ATP depletion. The antioxidant capacity ranked as LCEE + GA combination > GA > LCEE. In juice, all formulations inhibited microbial growth and enhanced antioxidant activity. Notably, GA and the combination more effectively increased total phenolic content, whereas LCEE uniquely enriched specific phenolic acids. Critically, the synergistic combination showed markedly less adverse impact on key juice quality parameters compared to LCEE alone. This study presents two natural antibacterial agents (LCEE and GA) along with their synergistic combination; provides a comparative analysis of their efficacy; and offers novel formulations to control Alicyclobacillus-mediated spoilage in fruit juice production.

Indexed as

AlicyclobacillusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCitrus sinensisFruit and Vegetable JuicesGallic AcidPlant ExtractsAntioxidantsFood PreservationFood PreservativesFruitMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsFood PreservativesGallic AcidPlant ExtractsAlicyclobacillus acidoterrestrisantibacterialantioxidantfood spoilagegallic acidHaskap berries (Lonicera caerulea L.)

Identifiers

PMID42629599
PMCPMC13498665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.