SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2026
Psychosocial coping with intensive care delirium: a mixed-methods systematic review of patient and family perspectives.
Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis review aims to identify, synthesize, and critically appraise evidence on psychosocial coping strategies employed by intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their family caregivers during an episode of ICU delirium, organized within the transactional model of stress and coping.
designMixed-methods systematic review (MMSR) following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). INFORMATION SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PSYNDEX. The literature search concluded on the 6th of November 2025.
methodsFollowing JBI methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews, qualitative findings were analyzed using the JBI meta-aggregation approach. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The transactional model of stress and coping served as the theoretical framework. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement.
resultsTen qualitative studies were included, originating from seven countries, published between 1999 and 2025. No quantitative studies meeting the eligibility criteria were identified, representing a significant gap in literature. Patients employed problem-focused coping strategies (active sense-making, reality orientation, proactive avoidance of delirium triggers), emotion-focused strategies (social connection, distancing, self-control), and meaning-based strategies (positive reappraisal, identity restoration). Families directed coping efforts both at supporting the patient through emotional presence, active reorientation, cognitive stimulation, and collaboration with the healthcare team, and at managing their own distress through information-seeking, avoidance, and positive reappraisal.
conclusionsBoth ICU patients and their families actively employ a broad range of coping strategies in response to delirium, consistent with the transactional model of stress and coping. Family caregivers emerge as a primary coping resource for patients while simultaneously managing their own psychological burden. These findings suggest that coping strategies may directly influence the trajectory of delirium-related psychological distress, and provide an evidence base for developing patient- and family-centered, coping-informed psychosocial interventions in ICU delirium care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.