Article in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Valentina VallejosInstituto de Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco, Chile.
Domingo Sancho-KnapikDepartamento de Sistemas Agrícolas, Forestales y Medio Ambiente, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Zaragoza, España.
Constanza F RamírezLaboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular Vegetal, Instituto de Agroindustria, Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Lohengrin A CavieresInstituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad-IEB, Concepción, Chile.
León A BravoLaboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular Vegetal, Instituto de Agroindustria, Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4705-4842
José Javier Peguero-PinaDepartamento de Sistemas Agrícolas, Forestales y Medio Ambiente, Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón (CITA), Zaragoza, España.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8903-2935
Eustaquio Gil-PelegrínDepartamento de Biología Vegetal, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (EEAD-CSIC), Zaragoza, España.
Jeroni GalmésResearch Group on Plant Biology Under Mediterranean Conditions, INAGEA-Universitat de Les Illes Balears, Balearic Islands, Spain.
Patricia L SáezLaboratorio de Fisiología y Biología Molecular Vegetal, Instituto de Agroindustria, Departamento de Ciencias Agronómicas y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8594-7329
Funding
National Research and Development Agency (ANID) ANID-ANILLO ATE-250034National Research and Development Agency (ANID) FB-210006
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Leaf hydraulics and their coordination with photosynthesis are central to maintaining plant physiological function, especially in plants inhabiting extreme environments. We investigated the hydraulic responses of the only two vascular plant species native to Antarctica, Deschampsia antarctica and Colobanthus quitensis, to long-term in situ warming imposed by open-top chambers (OTCs), and assessed how these responses covary with photosynthesis (A
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Contrasting Hydraulic-Photosynthetic Strategies Sustain Antarctic Vascular Plants Under Long-Term Warming. · full record | OpenQuestion