ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Latent profiles and network dynamics of psychological frailty in older adults: a computational simulation study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies on psychological frailty in older adults have typically examined individual components or assumed population homogeneity, often overlooking latent heterogeneity and complex symptom interrelations. This study aimed to identify latent profiles of psychological frailty and to integrate computational simulation with network analysis to explore patterns of symptom associations.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 4,735 adults aged 65 years or older. Psychological distress, cognitive function, physical vulnerability, and memory decline were assessed using established measures from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Latent profile analysis was conducted in Mplus to identify subgroups, followed by Gaussian graphical model network analysis in R to examine symptom interrelations within each profile. Additionally, an in silico simulation approach using the NodeIdentifyR algorithm was applied to estimate changes in overall network burden under hypothetical symptom perturbations.
resultsThree latent profiles were identified: Relatively Healthy (57.8%), Moderate Distress (32.8%), and Severe Cognitive Deterioration (9.4%). Network structures differed significantly between the Moderate Distress and Severe Cognitive Deterioration profiles. The former showed higher centrality of orientation-related symptoms, whereas the latter was characterized by greater centrality of affective symptoms. In simulation analyses, hypothetical increases in powerlessness, depression, attentional problems, and functional limitations were associated with the largest estimated increases in overall network burden, whereas symptom-response patterns differed across latent profiles.
conclusionThis cross-sectional study identified distinct latent profiles of psychological frailty and demonstrated differences in symptom network organization across profiles. The simulation findings indicate that certain symptoms may be associated with greater model-based changes in network activation. These results provide an exploratory framework for understanding heterogeneity in psychological frailty, but require validation in longitudinal and intervention studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.