ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Relative colon wall attenuation - distinguishing ischemia from other colon wall changes.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiation of bowel wall changes between ischemia and other causes in CT imaging can prove challenging, particularly in colon wall. Therefore, measurement of relative colon wall attenuation and contrast uptake were evaluated for aiding in diagnosis of colon ischemia.
methodsCTs with inquiry for bowel ischemia were retrospectively identified. Cases involving colon ischemia or colon wall changes of other etiologies were included. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in representative areas of colon wall with and without evident changes, in arterial and venous phase images, respectively. Means of the ROIs were used to calculate the relative bowel enhancement between affected and unaffected wall in each contrast phase, as well as the contrast uptake of the wall between phases. Relative enhancement and contrast uptake were compared between patients with and without ischemia. A subset of cases was reanalyzed for intra- and inter-reader comparison.
results31 patients with and 56 patients without ischemia were included. Relative enhancement of affected to unaffected colon wall was -51.2% in arterial phase and -44.6% in venous phase images for patients with ischemia. Relative enhancement was significantly higher in patients without ischemia at -0.5% in both phases (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in contrast uptake of affected bowel (40.6% vs. 39.8% respectively, p = 0.67). ROC curves revealed a maximum Youden-Index at a cut-off of -37.4% (AUC: 0.818) in arterial phase to differentiate between groups. Intra-reader comparison showed a good, and inter-reader a moderate, correlation in a subset.
conclusionsObjective measurement of relative colon wall attenuation between affected and unaffected areas can be an additional imaging feature to aid in identifying ischemic colon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.