Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42629526›Full record

Observational studyJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026

Clinical differences between destination therapy and bridge-to-transplant left ventricular assist device implantation: a 17-year single-center experience in Japan.

Koichi Inoue, Daisuke Yoshioka, Yusuke Misumi, Ai Kawamura, Shin Yajima, Takuji Kawamura, Shunsuke Saito, Takashi Yamauchi, Shigeru Miyagawa

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Koichi InoueDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Daisuke YoshiokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. yoshioka.daisuke.ssy@osaka-u.ac.jp.
Yusuke MisumiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Ai KawamuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shin YajimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takuji KawamuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shunsuke SaitoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takashi YamauchiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shigeru MiyagawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation for destination therapy (DT) has been recently increased worldwide. In 2021, DT was also approved in Japan. Here, we report a single-institution experience of LVAD implantation for DT. This retrospective observational study was conducted at Osaka University Medical Hospital in Japan. Forty patients who underwent LVAD implantation for DT were included. The primary endpoint was on-device survival, and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of LVAD-related complications at five years. The on-device survival rates were 82.3%, 73.3%, and 49.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Most patients (90.6%) experienced rehospitalization during the follow-up period and the most common cause was LVAD-related infection. One-quarter of the patients (10 cases) required LVAD pump exchange, also most commonly due to LVAD-related infection. Comparative analysis with 213 patients who underwent LVAD implantation for bridge to transplant (BTT) revealed no significant change in the primary and secondary outcomes. Our results demonstrate favorable clinical outcomes for LVAD implantation for DT in this Japanese cohort.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHeart TransplantationAdultAgedBridge TherapyFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDestination therapyEnd stage heart failureLeft ventricular assist device

Identifiers

PMID42629526
PMCPMC13498637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.