Observational studyJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2026
Clinical differences between destination therapy and bridge-to-transplant left ventricular assist device implantation: a 17-year single-center experience in Japan.
Observational study in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation for destination therapy (DT) has been recently increased worldwide. In 2021, DT was also approved in Japan. Here, we report a single-institution experience of LVAD implantation for DT. This retrospective observational study was conducted at Osaka University Medical Hospital in Japan. Forty patients who underwent LVAD implantation for DT were included. The primary endpoint was on-device survival, and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of LVAD-related complications at five years. The on-device survival rates were 82.3%, 73.3%, and 49.8% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Most patients (90.6%) experienced rehospitalization during the follow-up period and the most common cause was LVAD-related infection. One-quarter of the patients (10 cases) required LVAD pump exchange, also most commonly due to LVAD-related infection. Comparative analysis with 213 patients who underwent LVAD implantation for bridge to transplant (BTT) revealed no significant change in the primary and secondary outcomes. Our results demonstrate favorable clinical outcomes for LVAD implantation for DT in this Japanese cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.