Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42629500›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2026

Bonsai reconstructs tree representations for distortion-free visualization and exploration of high-dimensional data.

Daan H de Groot, Sarah X Morillo Leonardo, Mikhail Pachkov, Erik van Nimwegen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daan H de GrootBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel, Switzerland. daanhugodegroot@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-8950
Sarah X Morillo LeonardoBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0503-5606
Mikhail PachkovBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7616-6435
Erik van NimwegenBiozentrum, University of Basel, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel, Switzerland. erik.vannimwegen@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6338-1312

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 310030 184937Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) CRSII5 189910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell omics methods provide sparse, noisy measurements of high-dimensional cell states, whose underlying distributions remain poorly understood, raising an urgent need for exploratory analysis and visualization methods. However, current methods are ad hoc and uninterpretable, and they distort the structure in the data. We overcome these challenges by representing data on trees and present Bonsai, a method that reconstructs the most likely tree relating any set of high-dimensional objects with arbitrary heterogeneous measurement noise. Bonsai automatically regularizes noise, accurately recovers differentiation trajectories, preserves high-dimensional distances and improves nearest-neighbor identification. When applied to blood cell data, Bonsai not only accurately recovers known lineage relationships but also discovers a subtype of natural killer (NK) cells deriving from the myeloid lineage, pinpointing genes distinguishing myeloid NK from lymphoid NK cells. Bonsai has no tunable parameters, integrates downstream exploratory analyses methods with Bonsai-scout and scales to large datasets, making it applicable to visualizing the structure in any set of high-dimensional objects.

Identifiers

PMID42629500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.