Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42629470›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Simulating Reality and Transforming Endoscopic Education-Lessons from Esophageal Dilation.

Dustin Romain, John Fang, Abdulrahman Qatomah, Daryl Ramai

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dustin RomainDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
John FangDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Abdulrahman QatomahDepartment of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Daryl RamaiDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Daryl.Ramai@hsc.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although endoscopic training has traditionally relied on mentorship and procedural volume to assess proficiency, the major gastroenterology societies have increasingly adopted competency-based assessment tools, including the Assessment of Competency in Endoscopy (ACE) and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS), to provide a more objective evaluation of technical and cognitive skills. Despite these advances, mentor-based assessment remains susceptible to subjectivity. Emerging technologies such as simulation, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence (AI) offer opportunities to further standardize endoscopic education and enhance training. Simulation-based learning improves early endoscopic competency, exhibiting utility in both basic and advanced procedures. Similarly, AI applications in endoscopy are expanding beyond lesion detection to include procedural guidance, anatomical recognition, and performance optimization. Esophageal dilation for benign esophageal strictures serves as a model to illustrate the integration of these technologies into endoscopic education. Though the procedure requires mastery of risk stratification, device selection, and technical execution, competency assessment remains primarily volume-based. AI-assisted systems may provide real-time guidance for stricture characterization, dilator selection, and procedural endpoints, whereas simulation platforms may facilitate skill acquisition in a risk-free environment. The integration of simulation and AI into competency-based curricula has the potential to accelerate learning, reduce subjectivity, and improve endoscopic training.

Indexed as

Benign esophageal stricturesCompetency-based assessmentsComputer-aided detectionSimulatorsVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42629470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.