ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Dual-stage anatomical perception and reasoning framework for automated cobb angle estimation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and automated Cobb angle measurement is essential for the diagnosis and management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). However, existing deep learning approaches often ignore the intrinsic anatomical dependencies of the spine, which results in physiologically implausible estimations. We propose a two-stage anatomical perception and reasoning framework based on keypoint detection for Cobb angle measurement. The anatomical perception stage is built upon a Local-to-Global Aggregation Backbone (LGAB), which combines convolutional neural networks and Transformers to jointly capture local anatomical details and global spinal context. The resulting feature representations are further refined by a Semantic Guidance Module (SGM) to facilitate cross-scale feature fusion and improve vertebral keypoint localization. In the second stage anatomical reasoning, an Anatomical Reasoning Network (ARN) models all detected vertebral center keypoints as a structured graph. By embedding anatomical priors and applying dynamic relational reasoning, the ARN refines the spatial configuration of keypoints, which ensures anatomical coherence and corrects subtle localization errors. The optimized keypoints are then used to calculate the Cobb angle. The proposed framework achieves a Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (SMAPE) of 6.61%, a Cobb Mean Absolute Error (CMAE) of 2.67°, and an Error of Center ([Formula: see text]) of 24.58 pixels on the public AASCE 2019 Challenge dataset. Furthermore, the framework achieves a comparable CMAE of 2.11° on an independent clinical dataset. These results demonstrate that the proposed method provides a reliable foundation for precise and automated Cobb angle measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42629459What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.