ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
A randomized pilot trial comparing anti-thymocyte globulin with anti-thymocyte globulin plus post transplant cyclophosphamide for prophylaxis against acute and chronic graft versus host disease in matched donor hematopoietic cell transplants - a study from the Cell Therapy Transplant Canada/ Australasian Leukemia Lymphoma Group Consortium.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04202835 (A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Anti-Thymocyte Globulin), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (ATG) With ATG Plus Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for Prophylaxis Against Acute and Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a randomized pilot trial we compared ATG (standard Arm A, 4.5 mg/kg) with ATG plus PTCy (experimental Arm BE, ATG 4.5 mg/kg, PTCy 100 mg/kg). The primary safety endpoint was overall survival at 100 days. We analyzed 79 patients with AML (n = 55) or MDS (n = 24). Median age (range) was 59 (19 to 74), 47 (59.5%) were male. Conditioning was either myeloablative (n = 49) or reduced intensity (n = 30). Donors were 8/8 HLA-matched. Overall survival at 100 days was 95.0% (37 of 39 patients) vs 94.9% (38 of 40 patients) in arm A vs arm BE (p > 0.9). In arms A versus BE, serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 26 (65.0%) and 25 (64.1%) patients, graft failure occurred in 3 and 1 patients (p > 0.9), median (range) days to neutrophil engraftment were 19 (10-45) versus 22 (15-56) days p = 0.007), cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus reactivations occurred in 11 and 7 patients (p = 0.45) and in 6 and 5 patients (p = 0.29). Overall survival at 12 months was 72.5% versus 75.8% (p = 0.79), cumulative incidence at 6 months of relapse was 15.0% versus 15.7% (p = 0.88) and of non-relapse mortality (NRM) 7.5% versus 8.0 (p = 0.45). The combination of ATG and PTCy can safely be used in phase III trials.Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04202835), November 29, 2019.
Identifiers
42629427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.