Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42629409›Full record

ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026

Analytical validation and harmonization of activity-based protease assays: requirements for clinical translation.

Adam Lesner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adam LesnerFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308, Gdańsk, Poland. adam.lesner@ug.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8335-3431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activity-based (catalytic) measurement of proteases in body fluids has emerged as a diagnostic modality distinct from antibody-based concentration measurement, supported by proof-of-concept evidence in oncologic and non-oncologic disease. In analytical chemistry terms, the open question is how to characterize and control a reaction-rate measurement made in a complex biological matrix. This review sets out the analytical validation, standardization, and quality assurance requirements that would allow a research-grade catalytic protease assay to become a laboratory-developed test or an approved in vitro diagnostic. We delimit the assay class across its reporter formats, explain why the metrological framework of clinical chemistry must be adapted for activity measurement in complex matrices, and operationalize the core analytical parameters for a kinetic, matrix-dependent readout: analytical specificity, precision, detection and quantification limits, linearity, trueness, robustness, and interference. We address the unresolved problem of defining and tracing a unit of proteolytic activity, the absence of quality control materials and external quality assessment schemes, and the regulatory pathway under current US and European frameworks. Catalytic protease measurement is analytically plausible and biologically informative but remains research-grade. Its translation depends less on new biology than on analytical validation, harmonization, quality control, and regulatory conformity. We propose a staged minimum validation-and-reporting framework, condensed into a checklist, as a starting point for the field to develop by consensus.

Indexed as

CalibrationExternal quality assessmentLaboratory-developed testMeasurement uncertaintyMetrological traceabilityPeptide substrate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.