ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Analytical validation and harmonization of activity-based protease assays: requirements for clinical translation.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Activity-based (catalytic) measurement of proteases in body fluids has emerged as a diagnostic modality distinct from antibody-based concentration measurement, supported by proof-of-concept evidence in oncologic and non-oncologic disease. In analytical chemistry terms, the open question is how to characterize and control a reaction-rate measurement made in a complex biological matrix. This review sets out the analytical validation, standardization, and quality assurance requirements that would allow a research-grade catalytic protease assay to become a laboratory-developed test or an approved in vitro diagnostic. We delimit the assay class across its reporter formats, explain why the metrological framework of clinical chemistry must be adapted for activity measurement in complex matrices, and operationalize the core analytical parameters for a kinetic, matrix-dependent readout: analytical specificity, precision, detection and quantification limits, linearity, trueness, robustness, and interference. We address the unresolved problem of defining and tracing a unit of proteolytic activity, the absence of quality control materials and external quality assessment schemes, and the regulatory pathway under current US and European frameworks. Catalytic protease measurement is analytically plausible and biologically informative but remains research-grade. Its translation depends less on new biology than on analytical validation, harmonization, quality control, and regulatory conformity. We propose a staged minimum validation-and-reporting framework, condensed into a checklist, as a starting point for the field to develop by consensus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42629409What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.