ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Weighted and unweighted comorbidity burden for predicting three-year neurodevelopment in extremely preterm infants: A nationwide cohort study.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the prognostic utility of unweighted morbidity counts and weighted morbidity scores for predicting neurodevelopmental outcomes at 3 years in extremely preterm infants. STUDY
designThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Neonatal Research Network of Japan and included infants born at <28 weeks' gestation. Neurodevelopment at 3 years was assessed using developmental quotient and cerebral palsy. Cumulative morbidity burden was quantified using unweighted morbidity counts and weighted morbidity scores derived from log-odds ratios for severe impairment. Inverse probability weighting addressed incomplete follow-up.
resultsBoth unweighted morbidity counts and weighted morbidity scores were significantly associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. Unweighted morbidity counts demonstrated higher sensitivity for identifying any adverse outcome, whereas weighted morbidity scores showed high specificity (0.94) for severe impairment.
conclusionUnweighted morbidity counts and weighted morbidity scores provide complementary prognostic information and may improve risk stratification, follow-up prioritization, and family counseling for extremely preterm infants.
Identifiers
42629398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.