Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42629391›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2026

Health status impairments in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients versus blood or marrow transplant survivors and non-cancer controls.

Smita Bhatia, Qingrui Meng, Lindsey Hageman, Sarah B Palmer, Eunice E Choe, Nora Balas, Wendy Landier, Omer Jamy, Pankit Vachhani, Alysia Bosworth and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Smita BhatiaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. smitabhatia@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-5683
Qingrui MengUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Lindsey HagemanUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Sarah B PalmerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Eunice E ChoeUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Nora BalasUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Wendy LandierUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-5652
Omer JamyUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2411-4742
Pankit VachhaniUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9779-6217
Alysia BosworthCity of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0662-5699
F Lennie WongCity of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Jorge CortesUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Stephen J FormanCity of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2803-4152
Daniel J WeisdorfUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8078-8579
Saro H ArmenianCity of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Ravi BhatiaUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-2316

Funding

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (NCI Division of Cancer Prevention) R01 CA078938Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (NCI Division of Cancer Prevention) U01 CA213140Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (Leukemia & Lymphoma Society) R6502-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has resulted in a significant reduction in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-related mortality. However, the impact of TKIs on the health status of long-term CML survivors remains unstudied. We examined the health status of 62 TKI-treated CML patients who did not receive blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) (CML_TKI; median follow-up: 12.5 y) compared with an unaffected population (303 non-CML controls), and CML patients treated with BMT but without TKI exposure (220 CML_BMT; median follow-up 19.4 y). Participants self-reported general health, functional status, activity limitations, and pre-frailty/frailty. Overall, 71.0% of CML_TKI participants had ≥1 adversely-affected domain vs. 42.6% of non-CML and 65.9% of CML_BMT participants. When compared with the non-CML controls, the CML_TKI cohort was more like to have poor general health (aOR = 4.43, 95%CI = 1.8-10.7), functional impairment (aOR=2.84, 95%CI = 1.4-6.0), and activity limitation (aOR=3.37, 95%CI = 1.7-6.7) and more likely to be frail/pre-frail (aOR=3.71, 95%CI = 1.7-8.1). The CML_TKI and CML_BMT cohorts were comparable with respect to poor general health (aOR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.5-2.0), functional impairment (aOR = 1.59, 95%CI = 0.8-3.0), and pre-frailty/frailty (aOR = 1.92, 95%CI = 0.92-4.0), but the CML_TKI cohort was more likely to report activity limitation (aOR = 2.2, 95%CI = 1.1-4.5). These findings inform a need for long-term monitoring and development of risk mitigation strategies to improve the health status as a treatment goal in CML care.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.