ArticleLeukemia2026
Health status impairments in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-treated chronic myeloid leukemia patients versus blood or marrow transplant survivors and non-cancer controls.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has resulted in a significant reduction in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-related mortality. However, the impact of TKIs on the health status of long-term CML survivors remains unstudied. We examined the health status of 62 TKI-treated CML patients who did not receive blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) (CML_TKI; median follow-up: 12.5 y) compared with an unaffected population (303 non-CML controls), and CML patients treated with BMT but without TKI exposure (220 CML_BMT; median follow-up 19.4 y). Participants self-reported general health, functional status, activity limitations, and pre-frailty/frailty. Overall, 71.0% of CML_TKI participants had ≥1 adversely-affected domain vs. 42.6% of non-CML and 65.9% of CML_BMT participants. When compared with the non-CML controls, the CML_TKI cohort was more like to have poor general health (aOR = 4.43, 95%CI = 1.8-10.7), functional impairment (aOR=2.84, 95%CI = 1.4-6.0), and activity limitation (aOR=3.37, 95%CI = 1.7-6.7) and more likely to be frail/pre-frail (aOR=3.71, 95%CI = 1.7-8.1). The CML_TKI and CML_BMT cohorts were comparable with respect to poor general health (aOR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.5-2.0), functional impairment (aOR = 1.59, 95%CI = 0.8-3.0), and pre-frailty/frailty (aOR = 1.92, 95%CI = 0.92-4.0), but the CML_TKI cohort was more likely to report activity limitation (aOR = 2.2, 95%CI = 1.1-4.5). These findings inform a need for long-term monitoring and development of risk mitigation strategies to improve the health status as a treatment goal in CML care.
Identifiers
42629391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.