ArticleScientific reports2026
Optical-acoustic resonance fingerprinting of food-matrix perturbations in a phoxonic defect cavity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a compact defect-mode phoxonic crystal framework for the dual optical-acoustic characterization of contamination-induced changes in food media. The proposed sensing platform consists of a food-sensitive defect cavity positioned between two Bragg mirrors, where perturbations in the effective optical and acoustic properties of the defect medium generate complementary resonance responses. The optical response was evaluated using the transfer matrix method, whereas the acoustic response was described through an effective defect-mode resonance model. Contamination was represented by a normalized perturbation parameter that modifies the refractive index, optical loss, density, and sound velocity of the investigated food media. Increasing contamination produced a systematic optical resonance redshift and acoustic resonance downshift, confirming that the two channels probe distinct but related physical properties. The optical sensitivity varied from 4.4025 to 7.6953 nm/fraction, while the acoustic sensitivity ranged from 77.901 to 105.314 kHz/fraction, with highly linear behavior throughout the studied range. Under the assumed readout noise floors, the estimated limits of detection were 0.00390-0.03716 fraction for the optical channel and 0.01558-0.01991 fraction for the acoustic channel. Optical-acoustic fingerprinting and a relative phoxonic contamination index were further introduced to compare the dual-channel responses of different food samples. The combined response increased the mean normalized endpoint separation to 0.761, representing a 46.7% improvement over the best single-channel result. Additional analyses of Q-factor degradation, representative field localization, thickness tolerance, surface roughness, phase response, and group delay were included to clarify the sensing mechanism and evaluate structural robustness. The results indicate that defect-mode phoxonic crystals can provide a useful numerical platform for contamination-sensitive food characterization. Nevertheless, the present work remains an effective numerical proof-of-concept, and experimental implementation, calibration, and validation using real contaminated food samples are required before direct biochemical or microbiological detection can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.