ArticleScientific data2026
Glioblastoma MRI Dataset with Standardized Preprocessing, Expert-Validated Segmentation, and MGMT Profiling.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- PET|MR Open Source Radiomics Models for Treatment Outcome Prediction in Recurrent GBM.Cancers · 2026Article
- Glioblastoma MRI Dataset with Standardized Preprocessing, Expert-Validated Segmentation, and MGMT Profiling.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma research increasingly relies on large, well-curated imaging datasets that combine standardized MRI data, accurate tumor segmentations, and molecular profiling. We constructed a multi-center dataset of preoperative MRI scans from 337 patients with histologically confirmed primary glioblastoma collected across eight hospitals. All cases include T1-weighted (pre- and post-contrast), T2-weighted, and FLAIR sequences. Images underwent systematic quality assessment, BIDS organization, defacing, skull stripping, and linear registration to the MNI152 template. Tumor segmentation was performed using a SegResNet CNN model following the BraTS labeling convention, with all masks reviewed and manually refined by neuroradiologists. MGMT promoter methylation status was determined for all patients. This dataset provides a robust, clinically representative resource for radiomics, deep learning, and radiogenomic research in glioblastoma, supporting concrete downstream tasks including automated segmentation benchmarking (mean Dice = 0.94) and MGMT methylation prediction (baseline ACC = 0.60). Its multi-center origin, comprehensive preprocessing, expert-refined segmentations, and complete MGMT annotations address limitations of existing datasets and support the development and validation of reproducible imaging biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.