ArticleCancer cell2026
Proteo-genomics-guided interpretation of somatic mutations in cancer genomes.
Article in Cancer cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer genomes harbor hundreds of mutated genes, but their exact roles in tumorigenesis often remain incompletely understood. Here, by integrating protein structures with mutation data from 139,818 patients, we generate detailed, functional maps of mutations for 173 cancer genes in 18+ tumor types. In most cancer genes, oncogenic mutations accumulate in "significantly mutated regions" aligned with key functions, including DNA-binding domains in transcription factors (e.g., FOXA1), ligand-binding sites in receptors (e.g., ERBB2), catalytic domains in chromatin remodelers (e.g., EP300), substrate-recognition sites in ubiquitin-proteasome regulators (e.g., SPOP), and degradation signals in cell-cycle proteins (e.g., CCND1). In other cancer genes, mutations align more closely with constraints in three-dimensional protein structures, such as targeting the interior core (e.g., TP53) or a specific secondary structure (e.g., PTEN). Broadly, our study provides a proteo-genomic framework to characterize the effects of mutations in tumorigenesis and integrate them into workflows for clinical interpretation in precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.