ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2026
Shared genetic basis and structure of syndromic and normal facial variation.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The question of how gene mutations of large effect and common variants of small effect relate to phenotypic variation dates from the origins of genetics. Mendelian diseases result from rare germline variants with major effects, while complex traits are associated with multiple, mostly common variants of small effect. High-dimensional phenotypes, such as facial shape, can shed new light on this age-old dichotomy, as their variation can be characterized in terms of directions in multivariate morphospace. Within such spaces, do Mendelian disease mutations move phenotypes along the same directions as common variants, or do they forge new directions that diverge from the common structure of background variation? Here, we analyze facial shape variation for 66 syndromes, quantify multivariate axes of facial shape variation for each syndrome, and test whether common genetic variants in cohorts of non-syndromic subjects are associated with phenotypic position along these same axes. We find that syndromic facial shape generally follows the background variance-covariance structure of facial shape in the general population. Furthermore, syndromic probands' unaffected relatives have subtle facial morphology resembling the syndromes of their affected relatives. These results suggest that Mendelian disease variants act on facial shape in ways similar to common variants. Syndromic probands with higher "severity" likely occur on genetic backgrounds with higher cumulative severity of common variants for each syndromic axis. These findings position Mendelian diseases at extremes along phenotypic continua that exist in the background population rather than as qualitatively different phenotypes distinct from the overall structure of normal human phenotypic variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.