ArticleInfant behavior & development2026
Music and speech input in the home environments of Latinx infants.
Article in Infant behavior & development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infants' experience with the auditory world is culture-specific and shapes how their brains process complex sounds in their environment. The present study is the first to examine naturalistic exposure to speech and music, two main components of infants' auditory soundscapes, in Latinx U.S. infants (n = 64; age range 4-23mo). Through a bootstrapping approach, results are then compared to a previously published dataset of non-Latinx U.S. infants. Two daylong audio recordings per infant were captured with LENA. Using a crowdsourcing approach, 417 naïve listeners annotated a total of 6400 randomly sampled short audio snippets through an online citizen science platform. Latinx infants received more speech input than music input, replicating previously published results with non-Latinx infants. Likewise, as was the case for non-Latinx infants, Latinx infants were exposed to more music from an electronic source than an in-person source; a pattern that was again reversed for speech. However, while non-Latinx infants experienced more non-infant-directed (non-ID) music compared to infant-directed (ID) music, the opposite was true for Latinx infants: they experienced more ID music compared to non-ID music. Latinx infants also experienced overall more music, and more ID music, compared to their non-Latinx counterparts. Together, these results point to nuanced but important differences between the auditory environments of Latinx and non-Latinx infants. Enhanced exposure to ID music in the Latinx group may act as a promotive factor in a range of developmental areas and should be considered when evaluating infants' auditory environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.