ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Urinary tritium concentrations and associated environmental factors among residents living near a nuclear power plant in South Korea: a community-based biomonitoring study.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abnormally high tritium levels were identified at the Wolsong nuclear power plant (NPP) in 2019, prompting growing concern among nearby residents and public health authorities. The study aimed to investigate tritium internal exposure concentrations among residents and to identify potential internal exposure pathways. A total of 359 residents living within 15 km of the NPP with no occupational history at the facility were enrolled in this cross-sectional study in 2021. Participants were categorized into three distance-based zones. Tritium concentrations were measured in urine samples and local water resources. Statistical analyses were conducted using appropriate parametric tests and linear regression based on log-transformed data. The results showed that residents within 10 km of the NPP exhibited significantly higher urinary tritium levels (mean ± SD: 3.28 ± 2.28 Bq/L; 95% CI: 2.87-3.69; P < 0.05) compared with those living further away. Tap water within 5 km contained the highest tritium levels (6.6 ± 1.6 Bq/L), whereas groundwater in the 5-10 km zone showed elevated levels (2.0 ± 1.9 Bq/L). Participants who had visited the NPP in the previous 2 years presented higher urinary tritium levels than those who had not (P < 0.01). Overall, this study showed that urinary tritium concentrations varied according to residential distance and water resource. All measured urinary tritium levels were far below international safety limits. These findings establish essential baseline data for future surveillance and risk communication on nuclear-related public health issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.