ArticleScience advances2026
Intrinsic timing, not temporal prediction, underlies ramping dynamics in visual and parietal cortex during passive behavior.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ramping neural activity is widely interpreted as a signature of predictive processing, but whether these signals truly reflect predictions or instead emerge from sensory mechanisms remains unclear. To address this question, we used two-photon calcium imaging across multiple cell types in visual and parietal cortex, while awake mice passively received repeated audiovisual stimuli presented under distinct temporal structures. Neurons segregated into two broad response classes: stimulus-activated (ramp-down) and stimulus-inhibited (ramp-up) populations with diverse temporal kinetics. Multiple findings argued against a predictive interpretation: Ramping activity was present in naïve animals, neural responses changed immediately after short/long interval transitions, and unexpected stimulus timings elicited nearly identical responses in predictable and irregular contexts. Population analyses further showed that ramping reflected relaxation from stimulus-evoked activity rather than anticipatory buildup. Heterogeneous kinetics generated a robust population code for elapsed time. Together, these findings show that neural ramps during passive stimulation arise from stimulus-evoked dynamics that intrinsically generate temporal signals, rather than from temporal predictive processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.