Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627925›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Intrinsic timing, not temporal prediction, underlies ramping dynamics in visual and parietal cortex during passive behavior.

Yicong Huang, Ali Shamsnia, Mengze Chen, Shuang Wu, Timothy Stamm, Sophie Medico, Farzaneh Najafi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yicong HuangWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-6796-0604
Ali ShamsniaSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1137-6132
Mengze ChenSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8723-3654
Shuang WuSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2936-3751
Timothy StammSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-7727-686X
Sophie MedicoSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8589-0442
Farzaneh NajafiSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6454-2448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ramping neural activity is widely interpreted as a signature of predictive processing, but whether these signals truly reflect predictions or instead emerge from sensory mechanisms remains unclear. To address this question, we used two-photon calcium imaging across multiple cell types in visual and parietal cortex, while awake mice passively received repeated audiovisual stimuli presented under distinct temporal structures. Neurons segregated into two broad response classes: stimulus-activated (ramp-down) and stimulus-inhibited (ramp-up) populations with diverse temporal kinetics. Multiple findings argued against a predictive interpretation: Ramping activity was present in naïve animals, neural responses changed immediately after short/long interval transitions, and unexpected stimulus timings elicited nearly identical responses in predictable and irregular contexts. Population analyses further showed that ramping reflected relaxation from stimulus-evoked activity rather than anticipatory buildup. Heterogeneous kinetics generated a robust population code for elapsed time. Together, these findings show that neural ramps during passive stimulation arise from stimulus-evoked dynamics that intrinsically generate temporal signals, rather than from temporal predictive processing.

Indexed as

Parietal LobeVisual CortexAnimalsMiceNeuronsPhotic StimulationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID42627925
PMCPMC13496207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.