Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627868›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Microsaccadic eye movement generation is sufficient to enhance peripheral visual sensitivity.

Tong Zhang, Xiaoguang Tian, Tatiana Malevich, Matthias P Baumann, Ziad M Hafed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tong ZhangWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Xiaoguang TianWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Tatiana MalevichWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Matthias P BaumannWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ziad M HafedWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9968-119X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsaccades have been convincingly linked to extrafoveal covert attention shifts for more than two decades. However, the direction of causality between individual microsaccade generation and an alteration in both extrafoveal visual sensitivity and behavior remains debated: do microsaccades merely reflect, perhaps probabilistically, an altered extrafoveal sensitivity, or is the act of generating microsaccades sufficient, on its own, to modify such sensitivity? Using a novel exploitation of real-time retinal image stabilization, behavior, and neurophysiology in the superior colliculus of rhesus macaque monkeys, we show that exclusive experimental control over foveal oculomotor state is entirely sufficient to influence extrafoveal sensitivity. This happens for eccentricities as large as ~50 times those associated with microsaccades, and it also takes place in the absence of any differential attentional demands. Most importantly, such influence is mediated through well-known, classic pre- and post-saccadic visual processing changes. These results were also confirmed, and extended to larger saccades, using human psychophysical experiments. Thus, seemingly-innocuous subliminal eye movements do constitute an integral component of cognitive processes like attention.

Indexed as

SaccadesVisual PerceptionAnimalsAttentionFemaleFovea CentralisHumansMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationSuperior Colliculi

Identifiers

PMID42627868
PMCPMC13521465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.