ArticlePloS one2026
Tactical vs. strategic: An adaptable framework for horizon-dependent dengue forecasting using data-driven approaches with serotype and climate covariates in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue remains a major public health problem in endemic regions, including Bangladesh. Forecasting algorithms relying on climatic variables may not capture epidemiological information such as dengue serotype patterns. This study proposes a horizon-dependent dengue forecasting framework and applies it to Bangladesh. This pipeline included temporal, meteorological, demographic, and epidemiological covariates in a district-panel pipeline and compares classical, machine-learning, and deep-learning algorithms using aggregate, horizon-wise, regime-wise, outbreak-detection, and uncertainty metrics. Coefficient-based interpretation, SHAP, permutation importance, and nonlinear causal-dependence analysis were used to examine predictor impacts across horizons. SARIMAX was used as the baseline model. TFT produced quantile forecasts but showed poor interval calibration during outbreak periods. Results show that no single model performed best across all forecasting horizons: SARIMAX ranked highest for one-step outbreak alerting (precision = 0.886, recall = 0.824, F1 score = 0.854, and ROC-AUC = 0.950), whereas Prophet performed best for pooled magnitude forecasting at horizons 2-6. MLR showed competitive performance in regime-wise evaluation. These findings show that dengue forecasting algorithms should be selected according to the intended decision objective and evaluated using task-relevant protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.