Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627843›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Advances in small area population estimation in the absence of national census data.

Andrew J Tatem, Gianluca Boo, Heather R Chamberlain, Christopher C Nnanatu, Edith Darin, Douglas R Leasure, Ortis Yankey, Assane Gadiaga, Sabrina Juran, Luis de la Rua Rodriguez and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrew J TatemWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7270-941X
Gianluca BooWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4078-8221
Heather R ChamberlainWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-6974
Christopher C NnanatuWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.
Edith DarinDemographic Science Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1JD, United Kingdom.
Douglas R LeasureDemographic Science Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1JD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8768-2811
Ortis YankeyWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.
Assane GadiagaWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.
Sabrina JuranLatin America and the Caribbean Regional Office, United Nations Population Fund, Panama City 07144, Panama.
Luis de la Rua RodriguezLatin America and the Caribbean Regional Office, United Nations Population Fund, Panama City 07144, Panama.ORCID 0000-0002-2829-4827
Jessica EspeyWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.
Attila N LázárWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO22 5AT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2033-2013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population data at small area scales are essential for effective decision-making, influencing public health, disaster response, and resource allocation, among others. While national censuses remain the cornerstone of population data, they are often constrained by high costs, infrequent collection cycles, and coverage gaps, which can hinder timely data availability. To address these challenges, geospatial statistical approaches using limited microcensus surveys have been demonstrated as a reliable source, but the field has advanced substantially in recent years, with significant developments in both data sources and modeling methodologies. New approaches now leverage routine health intervention campaign data, satellite-derived settlement maps, and bespoke modeling approaches to produce reliable small area population estimates where enumeration is difficult or outdated. Various countries are applying these techniques to support census operations, health program planning, and humanitarian response. This manuscript reviews recent advances in "bottom-up" population mapping approaches, highlighting innovations in input data, modeling methods, and validation techniques. We examine ongoing challenges, including partial observation of buildings under forest canopy, population displacement, and institutional uptake. Finally, we discuss emerging opportunities to enhance these approaches through better integration with traditional data ecosystems, capacity strengthening, and coproduction with national institutions.

Indexed as

CensusesSmall-Area AnalysisHumanscensusgeostatistical modelspopulation modelingremote sensingsurveys

Identifiers

PMID42627843
PMCPMC13535191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.