ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Multisectoral collaboration on violence against women and children in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon: A comparative qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing global evidence highlights the significant intersections between violence against women (VAW) and violence against children (VAC), emphasising the need for collaboration among actors addressing VAW and VAC. However, tensions regarding prioritising women's and children's needs have led to fragmented approaches, in addition to knowledge gaps regarding effective collaborative efforts. This study aims to assess how the coordination between VAW and VAC programmes is conceptualised and operationalised in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon. Specifically, it seeks to identify a) how VAW and VAC collaboration is understood, b) challenges to its implementation, and c) recommendations for strengthening it. We conducted a situation analysis utilising document review and qualitative interviews. A policy document analysis was conducted across the study countries. Thirty key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders selected based on their experience in VAW and/or VAC work. Data were analysed thematically. Collaboration between efforts to address VAW and VAC was frequently described at the policy level through integrated, multi-sectoral family protection approaches, particularly in Lebanon and Jordan. Overall, few programmes and services adopted a coordinated approach to VAC and VAW, with varying concept understanding and quality across the three countries. A key cross-country finding was that VAC is often positioned as a more socially and politically acceptable entry point for addressing family violence, allowing actors to indirectly engage with VAW in cultural contexts where gender norms constrain specifically addressing VAW. Recommended opportunities for simultaneously preventing VAC and VAW included community-based youth programs, parenting initiatives, and involvement of cultural and religious leaders. The study highlights existing, albeit limited, coordinated approaches to addressing VAW and VAC in the three settings, however, their implementation is constrained by structural and systemic barriers. Given ongoing resource limitations,identifying interventions that can safely address both VAW and VAC outcomes is critical, when appropriate and safe to do so.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.