Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627839›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Multisectoral collaboration on violence against women and children in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon: A comparative qualitative study.

Mervat Alhaffar, Nour Horanieh, Noha Elsebaie, Dechol Ramazan, Alessandra Guedes, Loraine J Bacchus, Ismahan Ferhat, Suzan Kasht, Nisrine Tawily, Junita Upadhyay and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mervat AlhaffarDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-8790
Nour HoraniehDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Noha ElsebaieKroc Institute for International Peace Studies, Keough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States of America.
Dechol RamazanIndependent consultant, Erbil, Iraq.
Alessandra GuedesUNICEF Office of Strategy and Evidence - Innocenti, Florence, Italy.
Loraine J BacchusDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-8208
Ismahan FerhatUNICEF Middle East and North Africa Regional Office, Amman, Jordan.
Suzan KashtUNICEF Jordan Country Office, Amman, Jordan.
Nisrine TawilyUNICEF Lebanon Country Office, Beirut, Lebanon.
Junita UpadhyayUNICEF Iraq Country Office, Baghdad, Iraq.
Carlos Javier AguilarUNICEF Middle East and North Africa Regional Office, Amman, Jordan.
Manuela ColombiniDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing global evidence highlights the significant intersections between violence against women (VAW) and violence against children (VAC), emphasising the need for collaboration among actors addressing VAW and VAC. However, tensions regarding prioritising women's and children's needs have led to fragmented approaches, in addition to knowledge gaps regarding effective collaborative efforts. This study aims to assess how the coordination between VAW and VAC programmes is conceptualised and operationalised in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon. Specifically, it seeks to identify a) how VAW and VAC collaboration is understood, b) challenges to its implementation, and c) recommendations for strengthening it. We conducted a situation analysis utilising document review and qualitative interviews. A policy document analysis was conducted across the study countries. Thirty key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders selected based on their experience in VAW and/or VAC work. Data were analysed thematically. Collaboration between efforts to address VAW and VAC was frequently described at the policy level through integrated, multi-sectoral family protection approaches, particularly in Lebanon and Jordan. Overall, few programmes and services adopted a coordinated approach to VAC and VAW, with varying concept understanding and quality across the three countries. A key cross-country finding was that VAC is often positioned as a more socially and politically acceptable entry point for addressing family violence, allowing actors to indirectly engage with VAW in cultural contexts where gender norms constrain specifically addressing VAW. Recommended opportunities for simultaneously preventing VAC and VAW included community-based youth programs, parenting initiatives, and involvement of cultural and religious leaders. The study highlights existing, albeit limited, coordinated approaches to addressing VAW and VAC in the three settings, however, their implementation is constrained by structural and systemic barriers. Given ongoing resource limitations,identifying interventions that can safely address both VAW and VAC outcomes is critical, when appropriate and safe to do so.

Identifiers

PMID42627839
PMCPMC13496445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.