ArticlePloS one2026
Normative emotional responses to environmental sounds in middle-aged to older adults with normal hearing: Stimuli from the Marcell database.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to provide normative affective ratings for middle-aged to older adults with normal hearing using the Marcell database. The database includes 120 diverse environmental sounds representing various real-world acoustic events, such as those produced by animals, humans, musical instruments, tools, signals, and liquids. Secondary aims were to examine the relationship between valence and arousal, and whether factors such as age, gender, hearing-related lifestyle, hearing demands, and self-reported hearing difficulties influence these affective evaluations. STUDY SAMPLE: Ninety participants (mean age: 54 ± 9 years) with self-reported normal hearing. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The study was conducted online. Participants rated each sound token in the Marcell database in terms of valence (pleasantness) and arousal (intensity). They also completed a hearing-related lifestyle questionnaire assessing the frequency, importance, and difficulty of hearing in everyday situations. Normative data for valence and arousal were calculated as means and standard deviations across participants for each individual sound token. To explore the relationship between valence and arousal, correlation analyses were performed. Furthermore, mixed-effects linear regression was used to examine whether any of the measured variables could predict participants' affective responses to the sounds.
resultsNormative data for each individual sound token were obtained and reported. A moderately strong negative correlation was found between valence and arousal ratings, indicating that pleasant sounds were generally perceived as calming, while unpleasant sounds were seen as more arousing. Regression analyses revealed that age, gender, hearing-related lifestyle, hearing demands, and self-reported hearing difficulties did not significantly predict valence or arousal ratings in the current dataset of middle-aged to older adults.
conclusionsThe normative data presented in this study offer a benchmark for the hearing research community when examining emotional responses across middle-aged to older adult populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.