ArticlePloS one2026
Signal hierarchical petri nets: Formal semantics of hierarchical regulatory control of biological systems.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular commitment thresholds-such as metabolite concentrations triggering irreversible developmental transitions-cannot be derived as structural properties of network topology in classical computational formalisms. Existing numerical approaches (e.g., ODE bifurcation analysis) predict thresholds only after full parameterization; the threshold is an output of fitting, not of topology. The fundamental reason: classical models treat metabolites either as passive substrates (metabolic networks) or as Boolean switches (gene networks), lacking unified semantics for molecules functioning simultaneously as metabolic currencies and regulatory signals. We present signal hierarchy theory establishing formal foundations for hierarchical biological control. The theory proves two structural theorems: signal flow graphs must be acyclic, and lower-layer signal depletion structurally preempts higher-layer transitions-formalizing that resource exhaustion overrides regulatory programs regardless of controller abundance. We implement this theory as signal hierarchical Petri nets (SHPN), extending classical Bio-PN from 5-tuple to 13-tuple formalism with signal flow arcs enabling consumptive information propagation. Modelers designate any metabolite as signal place (ATP, GTP, NADH, cAMP, Ca2+) when biological evidence supports regulatory gating. Unlike test arcs (non-consuming catalysis), signal flow arcs create basin boundaries with commitment threshold Mcommit=θ+Ws computable directly from arc parameters-no simulation, no fitting. The formalism unifies metabolic-regulatory modeling: normal arcs for horizontal mass transfer, signal flow arcs for vertical information propagation. Applied to Bacillus subtilis sporulation, the formalism captures the Fujita and Losick (2005) observation: abrupt induction of Spo0A* yields only ≈5% sporulation while gradual KinA phosphorelay accumulation yields ≈52%. The asymmetry emerges structurally from the σH commitment separatrix (≈1.60μM): gradual accumulation allows the σH positive-feedback loop to cross threshold stochastically; an abrupt pulse fires before [σH] builds. Stochastic sweep simulation (25 conditions, 50 replicates) reproduces the 52% vs. ≈5% contrast; all arc parameters (Γ, phosphorelay rates, σH feedback) derive from published biological measurements-none was optimized to match this ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.