Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627825›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Radiomics-guided multimodal MRI fusion framework for non-enhanced glioblastoma noninvasive identification.

Shuai Liu, Xuewei Mao, Xing Liu, Shaowu Li, Shiwen Weng, Chenxing Wu, Wei Shan, Zhen Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shuai LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xuewei MaoSchool of Automation and the Shandong Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xing LiuBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shaowu LiBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shiwen WengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chenxing WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei ShanDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8616-2670
Zhen WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and externally validate a radiomics-based machine learning framework for the noninvasive differentiation of non-enhanced glioblastoma (NE-GBM) from astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, grade 2 (IDHm-A2), thereby addressing the diagnostic limitations of qualitative MRI and the challenge of data scarcity. This diagnostic study used a radiomics-based machine learning framework, with integrated histopathological and molecular diagnosis serving as the reference standard. We retrospectively enrolled 84 glioma patients (July 2021-November 2022) from our center, comprising 34 pathologically confirmed NE‑GBM. Radiomic features were extracted from T1, T2, FLAIR, and ADC sequences. The framework was developed to differentiate NE‑GBM from IDHm‑A2 and was subsequently validated on an internal test cohort (n = 22) and an external test cohort (n = 12). Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC analysis and decision curves, and model predictions were interpreted via SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). A total of 118 patients (47 NE‑GBM, 71 IDHm‑A2) were evaluated. Fifty‑four radiomic features and age were selected for model construction. The optimized model demonstrated strong discriminatory performance, with the internal test cohort achieving an AUC of 0.935 and an accuracy of 91.0%, and the external test cohort yielding an AUC of 0.969 and an accuracy of 90.0%. The proposed framework provides an accurate, noninvasive tool for distinguishing NE‑GBM from IDHm‑A2, directly addressing this critical diagnostic challenge.

Identifiers

PMID42627825
PMCPMC13496412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.