Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627816›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Integrated optimization of electroplating wastewater treatment: A comparative assessment of physicochemical treatment configurations and process enhancement using response surface methodology.

Soumaya Ibrahimi, Aicha Gasmi, Karim Kriaa, Farid Fadhillah, Majeed Ali Habeeb, Djamel Ghernaout, Noureddine Elboughdiri, Ahmed Hannachi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soumaya IbrahimiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, Gabes, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-9480
Aicha GasmiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, Gabes, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-4776
Karim KriaaCollege of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-604X
Farid FadhillahCollege of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4965-1459
Majeed Ali HabeebUniversity of Babylon, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Department of Physics, Babil, Iraq.
Djamel GhernaoutDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0806-3810
Noureddine ElboughdiriDepartment of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Ha'il, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2923-3062
Ahmed HannachiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Engineering Processes and Industrial Systems, National School of Engineering of Gabes, University of Gabes, Gabes, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assesses physicochemical treatment methods for industrial electroplating wastewater (EPW). Monitoring at a full-scale Tunisian facility revealed considerable instability in conventional systems. Residual nickel concentrations ranged from 0.02 ± 0.01 to 60 ± 0.4 mg/L. Chloride levels consistently exceeded regulatory thresholds, ranging from 442 ± 9-1418 ± 10 mg/L. Over 24 weeks, three treatment configurations were evaluated: ferric chloride-based coagulation (Configuration 1), polyaluminum chloride coagulation (Configuration 2), and lime slurry-based chemical attack (Configuration 3). Configuration 3 showed the most consistent performance. It achieved 99% chromium removal, 97% nickel removal, and 50% chloride reduction, while reducing chemical operating costs by 69% (0. 134 €· m ³ compared to 0. 432 €·m-3). A novel optimization strategy is presented that explicitly incorporates variability in influent nickel concentration ([Ni]ᵢ, 33-92 mg/L) as an independent factor. This is applied within a Response Surface Methodology-Central Composite Design, alongside pH (6.3-9.7) and flocculant dosage (2.2-9.4 mg/L). Fluctuations in wastewater composition are treated as a controlled design variable rather than experimental noise. This approach produces a robust predictive model ([Ni]f = f([Ni]ᵢ, pH, [A-PAM]) with high accuracy (R² = 0.9917). The resulting equation enables real- time adaptive chemical dosing. Operators can calculate optimal pH and flocculant requirements based on measured influent concentrations. Statistical analysis identified significant pH-metal loading interactions (F = 5.70, p = 0.044). This confirms that optimal parameters systematically shift with influent composition. Under model-predicted conditions, residual nickel consistently remained below 2 mg/L, despite substantial influent variability. This ensures regulatory compliance. The integrated approach shows that variability- responsive optimization enhances treatment efficacy, operational stability, and economic efficiency.

Indexed as

ElectroplatingWastewaterWater PurificationAluminum HydroxideChloridesChromiumFerric CompoundsFlocculationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationNickelWater Pollutants, ChemicalAluminum HydroxideChloridesChromiumferric chlorideFerric CompoundsNickelWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID42627816
PMCPMC13496402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.