ArticlePloS one2026
Post-acute and long-term cardiovascular effects following dengue infection: A systematic review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimDengue is a major arboviral disease in tropical and subtropical regions, traditionally regarded as an acute, self-limiting illness. However, emerging evidence suggests that its consequences may extend beyond the acute phase, especially involving the cardiovascular system. Reported manifestations include major adverse cardiovascular events, arrhythmias, thromboembolic complications, subclinical myocardial dysfunction, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular changes. Evidence remains fragmented due to variation in study designs, population characteristics, outcome definitions, and follow-up durations. This systematic review aims to appraise and synthesise evidence on post-acute and long-term cardiovascular outcomes following dengue infection, including their spectrum, comparative risk, and determinants. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol outlines a systematic review of cardiovascular outcomes in the post-acute and long-term phases of dengue infection. Human studies of any age group will be included if they report cardiovascular outcomes at least 4 weeks after acute dengue illness. Laboratory-confirmed dengue will be prioritised for primary comparative synthesis; clinically diagnosed dengue will contribute to descriptive synthesis and, where appropriate, subgroup or sensitivity analyses. Studies using cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, or case-series designs will be eligible. Comparative studies with dengue-negative or clearly defined reference controls will estimate effects where available, while non-comparative follow-up studies will contribute to descriptive synthesis. Outcomes will include major clinical cardiovascular events, including stroke or transient ischaemic attacks, subclinical cardiac or vascular abnormalities, and cardiovascular-related biomarkers. Searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers will independently perform screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias and critical appraisal assessments. Evidence will be synthesized narratively; where comparable, random-effects meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment will be conducted. PROSPERO registration: CRD420261354181. DISCUSSION: This review will summarize post-dengue cardiovascular sequelae and identify evidence gaps. Findings may clarify post-dengue cardiovascular risk and inform future research, clinical follow-up, and public health planning in dengue-endemic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.