ArticlePloS one2026
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Global Sleep Assessment Questionnaire in adult patients with sleep disorders.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to translate Global Sleep Assessment Questionnaire (GSAQ) in Chinese and to validate it in adult patients with sleep disorders.
methodsGSAQ was translated following the steps of scale translation. Two hundred and one adult patients (aged over 18 years old) with sleep disorders were recruited. All filled out the 11-item Chinese version of GSAQ. The translated version was tested by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criterion validity, Cronbach's α and spilt-half reliability. To evaluate the predictive ability of the questionnaire and elicit cutoff values, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated.
resultsOut of the 11 questions in the questionnaire, each item was significantly correlated with the total score by a correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.24 to 0.73. Four factors were extracted explained 68.89% of the total variance. Cronbach's α coefficient for the total scale of 11 items was 0.72 and for four factors was 0.81, 0.64, 0.76 and 0.72 respectively, with a split-half reliability of 0.75. ROC analysis yielded an AUC > 0.8. The "obstructive sleep apnea related", "insomnia related", "restless legs syndrome related", and "parasomnias related" scores showed cutoff values of 3,3,1,1, respectively. The GSAQ had positive correlation with AHI (r = 0.248 p = 0.0025), insomnia severity index (r = 0.322, p = 0.017) and the rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire (r = 0.721, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation between the total GSAQ score and iRLS (r = 0.140, p = 0.309).
conclusionThe Chinese version of the GSAQ is available and can be used to evaluate the sleep disorders of adult patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.