Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627797›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Awareness, knowledge, and cervical cancer screening behaviour in an urban informal settlement: Evidence from multinomial and interaction models.

Winfred Kananu Kubai, Alfred Owino Odongo, Gilbert Koome Rithaa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Winfred Kananu KubaiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mount Kenya University, Thika, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3162-1406
Alfred Owino OdongoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mount Kenya University, Thika, Kenya.
Gilbert Koome RithaaDepartment of Public and Global Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening uptake in Kenya remains far below global targets, particularly in urban informal settlements where knowledge gaps persist despite widespread awareness campaigns. Understanding how knowledge shapes screening behavior is critical to explaining the persistent gap between willingness and action. The objective was to examine knowledge-related determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake among mothers aged 25-49 years in Kiandutu Informal Settlement, focusing on both main knowledge effects and interaction effects with awareness. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 385 women. Screening behaviour was classified into three categories: Screened, Not Screened but Intends, and Not Screened, No Intention. Knowledge was measured using a composite index, and multinomial logistic regression, including interaction terms, was used to assess how knowledge and awareness jointly influence screening. Screening uptake was 48.8%. Only 18.2% of women with low knowledge had ever screened, and 62.1% had no intention to screen. Higher knowledge levels were strongly associated with screening (χ²(4) = 58.780, p < 0.001). Low knowledge independently predicted non-intention (AOR = 13.091, 95% CI: 5.526-31.013). The interaction model revealed a distinctive pattern: awareness without adequate knowledge sharply reduced intention to screen (Low Knowledge × Awareness AOR = 0.024, 95% CI: 0.003-0.219). Screening behaviour in informal settlements is shaped not by awareness alone but by the depth and accuracy of knowledge. Women require actionable understanding, not just exposure to health messages, to progress from awareness to screening intention and uptake. These findings highlight the importance of knowledge-dependent effects in cervical cancer screening behaviour.

Identifiers

PMID42627797
PMCPMC13496422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.