Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627784›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Service user and healthcare-worker perspectives on Substance Use Disorder treatment journeys, relapse, and recovery in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Uganda.

Claire Biribawa, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Joan Nankya Mutyoba, Byamah Brian Mutamba, Kenneth Kalani, Daniel Oyet, David Kalema, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Vicki Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claire BiribawaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-9305
Wouter VanderplasschenDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-4243
Joan Nankya MutyobaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Byamah Brian MutambaButabika National Referral Mental Health Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-443X
Kenneth KalaniMental Health Division, Uganda Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0160-0858
Daniel OyetDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
David KalemaDepartment of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nazarius Mbona TumwesigyeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7085-8780
Vicki SimpsonSchool of Nursing, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9340-4869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance Use Disorder (SUD) treatment in sub-Saharan Africa remains poorly understood from the perspectives of those who deliver and receive it. We integrated the perspectives of service users (SUs) and front-line health care workers (HCWs) within a single analytic frame to map SUD treatment trajectories and identify multilevel barriers and facilitators shaping treatment and recovery outcomes in Uganda. We conducted a qualitative study nested within a parent cohort of adults treated for SUDs at two public treatment facilities in Uganda. We conducted in-depth interviews with 43 SUs from this cohort and 10 HCWs directly involved in SUD care. We analysed the data using reflexive thematic analysis. SU and HCW data accounts were first analysed separately before applying integrative mapping to generate cross-cutting meta-themes. We identified four interrelated meta-themes. First, systemic and structural constraints, including human resource gaps, medication stockouts, and inadequate infrastructure, undermined care consistency and quality. Second, accounts suggested that SUD care was only partially aligned with the biopsychosocial model, with acute biomedical stabilisation more consistently implemented than psychosocial support, individualised care, and recovery planning. Third, participants described returning to high-risk post-treatment environments marked by stigma, weak family support, peer and environmental triggers, economic insecurity, and untreated comorbidities, which increased perceived relapse vulnerability. Fourth, they identified supportive anchors for recovery, including faith and spirituality, active coping, family and community engagement, peer mentorship, task-sharing, and strengthened multidisciplinary care. Participants' accounts indicate that SUD care and recovery in Uganda are shaped by a self-reinforcing cycle of system constraints, fragmented care, and high-risk post-discharge environments. Reorienting SUD care towards a recovery-oriented continuum will require stronger links between facility-based treatment and community support, alongside investment in psychosocial care, workforce capacity, service infrastructure, and locally available recovery resources.

Identifiers

PMID42627784
PMCPMC13496416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.