Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627779›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Eleven quick tips for Biomedical Federated Learning.

Kyle Ellrott, Venkat S Malladi, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Emek Demir, Yael Bensoussan, Serghei Mangul, Alex A T Bui, Paul C Boutros

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kyle EllrottDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6573-5900
Venkat S MalladiHealth Futures, Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington, United States of America.
Jean-Christophe Bélisle-PiponFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Emek DemirDivision of Oncological Sciences, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, United States of America.
Yael BensoussanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head &Neck Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, United States of America.
Serghei MangulSage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alex A T BuiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Paul C BoutrosSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0553-7520

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Robert Damoiseaux · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
Tool Core- BoutrosU54HG012517 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUI, ALEX, PING, PEIPEI · 2022 to 2025
$10.6M
Advancing method benchmarking and data sharing through crowd-sourced competitions in cancer researchU24CA248265 · NCI · SAGE BIONETWORKS · PI BOUTROS, PAUL CHRISTOPHER, VARMA, SUSHEEL · 2020 to 2024
$4.1M
Virginia-UCLA-Toronto Biomarker Characterization CenterU2CCA271894 · NCI · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI OLIVER John SEMMES · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS U24 CA248265NCI NIH HHS U2C CA271894NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG012517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern statistical and machine learning techniques are effective at describing, testing hypotheses and making predictions from complex data. This effectiveness is strongly influenced by the volume and heterogeneity of available data. In many fields, including much of biomedicine, large centralized datasets are not available because of cost, privacy, regulatory or other restrictions. In these cases, smaller datasets are distributed across a large number of independent sites. Medical record data is a classic example of this challenge: the total number of patients may be large, but their records are distributed across many health systems and cannot easily be centralized. Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning paradigm that enables training and validation of a shared model in settings of decentralized data. FL can improve model accuracy and generalizability by increasing sample size, but has trade-offs ranging from operational complexity to data-privacy risks to the potential to introduce unexpected imbalances in model accuracy. We outline ten tips for successfully and sustainably implementing FL for Biomedical applications, ensuring both ethical data governance and improved model performance in sensitive domains.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyFederated LearningMachine LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID42627779
PMCPMC13496424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.