ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Neurotechnological Natives and the Neurotechnology Shift: A Research Agenda for the Brain-as-Interface Era.
Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurotechnologies are increasingly moving beyond clinical and laboratory environments into a growing range of everyday contexts, including consumer markets, workplaces, and educational settings. This article presents the concept of the neurotechnology shift, understood as a technoscientific, cognitive, and sociocultural transformation through which neurotechnologies progressively expand into daily life, turning the brain itself into a shared interface between biological cognition and digital systems. This condition may eventually give rise to neurotechnological natives, a concept that is introduced here as a heuristic hypothesis intended to guide interdisciplinary research. Rather than predicting the emergence of a homogeneous generation shaped by neurotechnologies, the concept functions as an analytical tool to structure inquiry into the implications of brain-technology interaction in everyday contexts. To this end, the article outlines a research agenda organized across three dimensions of the neurotechnology shift: technoscientific infrastructures enabling scalable brain-technology interaction and neurodata ecosystems; cognitive implications related to neural plasticity, identity, impulse control, and language processes; and sociocultural transformations concerning governance, inequality and access, and collective imaginaries. Understanding the dynamics and bidirectional interactions across these three dimensions is essential for anticipating the ethical, legal, and societal implications of the emerging brain-as-interface era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.