Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627711›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia open2026

Attitudes toward sodium valproate use, withdrawal, and counseling in people of reproductive potential: A scoping review.

Katherine Wang, Sarah Loveday, Monica S Cooper, Emma Macdonald-Laurs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine WangDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah LovedayNeurodisability and Rehabilitation Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-8900
Monica S CooperDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6589-8451
Emma Macdonald-LaursDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-4610

Funding

Melbourne Children's Campus Clinician Scientist Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulatory restrictions and evolving clinical guidelines have aimed to reduce sodium valproate use in people of reproductive potential over the past decade due to its teratogenic risk. While clinical evidence and policy responses are well established, stakeholder perspectives remain less explored. This scoping review synthesizes the existing evidence on the attitudes of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals regarding sodium valproate use, withdrawal and counseling in females of childbearing age. This scoping review, conducted according to JBI Methodology for a Scoping Review and registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/HK7QN), analyzed studies which directly reported on, or measured, the attitudes of patients, caregivers and/or healthcare professionals regarding the use of sodium valproate for epilepsy in females. A structured search across four databases (EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) and the gray literature was performed. A thematic synthesis of data was conducted to identify important themes and concepts. A total of 22 studies including 14 peer-reviewed articles and 8 gray literature sources met the inclusion criteria, including only 2 qualitative studies. Most literature focused on patient and caregiver perspectives (n = 15), with fewer addressing healthcare professional views (n = 7). Methodology incorporating interviews (n = 2) or free-text survey responses (n = 3) was uncommon. Across the studies, three key themes emerged: (i) patient disempowerment due to limited knowledge and suboptimal counseling and risk communication; (ii) the influence of maternal identity formation on attitudes, behaviors and decision-making when navigating sodium valproate use; and (iii) concerns regarding regulatory responses, such as pregnancy prevention programs, particularly around implementation challenges, perceived paternalism and lack of individualized care. Published evidence on stakeholder attitudes toward sodium valproate use in people of reproductive potential remains limited. The existing literature highlights gaps in awareness, counseling, and patient-centered delivery of pregnancy prevention programs. Future research should prioritize qualitative studies to better understand stakeholder attitudes and experiences to inform future guidelines and clinical practice. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Sodium valproate is an antiseizure medication that can harm an unborn baby when used during pregnancy. National and international programs have been introduced to reduce its use among people who could become pregnant. This review explored the perspectives of patients, caregivers and healthcare providers regarding sodium valproate use and withdrawal. Key themes included experiences of disempowerment relating to risk communication, the influence of maternal identity on treatment decisions and concerns about regulatory approaches. These findings highlight factors contributing to challenges with pregnancy prevention programs, in particular gaps in shared decision-making, communication and patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Epiliminformed consentrisk communicationshared decision‐makingteratogens

Identifiers

PMID42627711
PMCPMC13496280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.