Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42627683›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Zero-Shot Classification of Postoperative Complications From Real-World Discharge Letters According to the Clavien-Dindo System Using Large Language Models in Liver Surgery: Comparative Study.

Sina Warmer, Kamyar Arzideh, Marie Morys, Ahmad Idrissi-Yaghir, Jan Bednarsch, Daniel Heise, Arzu Oezcelik, Marc Reschke, Tom F Ulmer, Ulf P Neumann and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sina WarmerInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2262-2655
Kamyar ArzidehInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6074-804X
Marie MorysInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4528-2322
Ahmad Idrissi-YaghirInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-9690
Jan BednarschDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-6452
Daniel HeiseDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6923-0849
Arzu OezcelikDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8353-9532
Marc ReschkeDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3113-4741
Tom F UlmerDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5793-1959
Ulf P NeumannDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-8917
Felix NensaInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-7100
Katarzyna BorysInstitute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6987-6041
René Hosch *Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1760-2342
Sophia M Schmitz *Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6732-1595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standardized extraction of postoperative complications from unstructured routine clinical documentation remains a major unresolved challenge in digital surgery and health informatics. Although the Clavien-Dindo classification is the established standard for grading postoperative complications, its application in routine clinical documentation is largely implicit and unstructured, limiting scalable quality assessment in surgical care.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the capability of open-weight and proprietary large language models (LLMs) to classify postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo system using discharge letters, benchmarked against expert annotation.

methodsWe analyzed discharge letters from 650 surgical cases of 649 patients (median 67, IQR 58-73 y; 229/649, 35% female) who underwent hepatobiliary surgery between 2010 and 2024. The cohort included grade I-II complications in 24% (153/650), grade III-IV in 19% (121/650), and grade V (death) in 6% (42/650) of patients. A total of 4 open-weight (Qwen3-235B [Alibaba Cloud], Llama-3.3-70B [Meta AI], GPT-OSS-120B [OpenAI], Ministral-3-8B [Mistral AI]) and 2 proprietary (GPT 5.1 [OpenAI], Gemini 3 Pro [Google]) LLMs were prompted to infer complication grades directly from the discharge letters in a zero-shot setting. Model performance was evaluated against expert assessment using accuracy, F

resultsInterrater agreement between the 2 clinical annotators yielded a Cohen κ of 0.75, providing a human benchmark for model performance interpretation. On the full 650-case dataset, open-weight models achieved accuracies ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 for fine-grained prediction, with weighted F

conclusionsLLMs demonstrated promising accuracy in classifying postoperative complications from discharge letters in a zero-shot setting, with performance approaching the upper bound of human interrater agreement. Open-weight models offer a particularly attractive trade-off between accuracy and computational efficiency, while ensemble strategies further enhance robustness. These results support the potential of LLMs to standardize complication assessment at scale and enable data-driven quality monitoring in surgical care.

Indexed as

LiverPatient DischargePostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAI in health careClavien-Dindo classificationhealth care interoperabilitylarge language modelsnatural language processingpostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID42627683
PMCPMC13545534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.