ArticleInfection2026
Empirical antipseudomonal antibiotic therapy and in-hospital mortality in biliary tract infections with bacteremia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the association between the use of empirical antipseudomonal antibiotics and in-hospital mortality in patients with bacteremia due to biliary tract infections.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using data from the JApan Bacteremia Inpatient Cohort Association (JA-BICA), a database of 1105 adult inpatients with bacteremia sourced from eight community general hospitals across Japan. Adult patients with bacteremia due to biliary tract infections were included in this study. Patients who received empirical antipseudomonal antibiotics on the day of hospital admission were categorized into the exposure group and those who did not receive such antibiotics were categorized into the comparison group. The primary outcome measure was the all-cause in-hospital mortality. We evaluated the association between antipseudomonal antibiotic use and in-hospital mortality using cumulative incidence functions and the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models with propensity score-based stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The missing covariates were addressed using multiple imputations.
resultsAmong 216 eligible patients, 160 (74.0%) received empirical antipseudomonal antibiotics. IPTW-weighted Fine-Gray analysis showed no detectable association between antipseudomonal antibiotic use and in-hospital mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.4-2.59; P = 0.96).
conclusionsIn the present study, no clear association was observed between empirical antipseudomonal antibiotic therapy and in-hospital mortality in patients with bacteremia due to biliary tract infection; however, the estimate was imprecise due to the limited number of events. These findings highlight the need for further studies to guide empirical antibiotics selection in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42627621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.